The new /sci/ wikihttps://4chan-science.fandom.com/wiki//sci/_Wiki(More resources in replies)
Reminder: /sci/ is for discussing topics pertaining to science and mathematics, not for helping you with your homework or helping you figure out your career path.If you want advice regarding college/university or your career path, go to /adv/ - Advice.If you want help with your homework, go to /wsr/ - Worksafe Requests
Falcon Heavy editionprevious: >>16147648
>>16149481Why is the elevator just dangling there?
>>16150071bricked up while docking
>>16150035youre hilariously stupid.
>>16150047JOHNSON!
from Greg Autry, nominated by Trump to be CFO of NASA. big commercial space guy. it matters whether your leaders care about space
Bad news fellow vaxxies, the "turbo cancer" rumor that the conspiracy theorists have been yammering about has turned out to be completely true, as proved by this recent publication:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38234925/>The "hallmarks of cancer" were proposed by Hanahan and Weinberg (2000) as a group of biological competencies that human cells attain as they progress from normalcy to neoplastic transformation. These competencies include self-sufficiency in proliferative signaling, insensitivity to growth-suppressive signals and immune surveillance, the ability to evade cell death, enabling replicative immortality, reprogramming energy metabolism, inducing angiogenesis, and activating tissue invasion and metastasis. Underlying these competencies are genome instability, which expedites their acquisition, and inflammation, which fosters their function(s). Additionally, cancer exhibits another dimension of complexity: a heterogeneous repertoire of infiltrating and resident host cells, secreted factors, and extracellular matrix, known as the tumor microenvironment, that through a dynamic and reciprocal relationship with cancer cells supports immortality, local invasion, and metastatic dissemination.
>>16149948https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/The-COVID-19-Inoculations-More-Harm-Than-Good-REV-Dec-16-2021.pdfits a summary of all alarming stats/facts about the same paper i posted earlier
>>16150025>>16149865alright so here's the mistake, on the third line, the person who made this chart substitued "any severe adverse event" for what is actually in the original paper "any severe event". As I said before, adverse event and any events aren't the same thing. You can argue that they're not properly reporting some events as adverse events and maybe you're right, maybe you're wrong, the fact is that this chart changed what the paper is saying and that I personally have no way to check how they reported these events.So we're left with a 10% increase in serious adverse events, and 300% increase in any adverse events. I'm not surprised personally, actually I'm surprised it's not more than that for the serious adverse events, everyone knows that it can induce myocarditis among other things, and I don't expect a placebo injection to be so close to those of a vaccine injection.for the second part about the death count, I tried to figure it out but it doesn't go into details, but as it shows in your own chart, there is no number for placebo, not even 0. Because it's nowhere mentionned how many people kept without a vaccine shot after the study period. If 90% of the people eventually got the shot, which isn't far fetched since it became mandatory for a large part of the world, it means you're practically left with only people who have received the vaccine. No wonder some of them continue to die. You're not comparing similar groups anymore.I don't know why you also keep repeating there's more people in the control group but it's false.>The participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive two 30-μg intramuscular injections, 21 days apart, of BNT162b2 (0.3 ml volume per dose) or saline placebo.
>>16150079Now about canadian covid care alliance :>Toronto, Ontario physician and cofounder of Canadian Covid Care Alliance, Ira Bernstein, launched Canadian Covid Telehealth, at the address of his Toronto practice, as a "covert prescription network" where he and his colleagues could prescribe ivermectin. In a November video announcing the creation of Canadian Covid Telehealth, Bernstein admitted that Health Canada has not approved the drug. He said, without evidence, that Health Canada and the regulators were not basing their claims against the use of ivermictin on "any credible science."https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_misinformation_in_Canadahttps://nypost.com/2023/06/06/doctor-busted-for-plot-to-kill-estranged-wife-after-serving-time-for-similar-plan/>A former New York podiatrist who served four years in prison for a botched murder-for-hire plot against his estranged wife has been charged in a second attempt to have his wife killed — this time recruiting his lawyer sister to destroy the evidence.>Ira Bernstein, 49, was charged with multiple felonies last week for attempting to solicit the murder of his wife, Susan Bernstein, between July 29 and Sept. 21, 2022, the Rockland County District Attorney’s Office announced.I didn't expect that second part and it's not entirely relevant to the argument you posted, but it's still interesting to know who is speaking
>>16150025another summary https://textup.fr/758549JD
>>16150083actually nevermind about the second part, he's a homonym but the one who co funded CCCA is a family physician, not a podiatrist
According to science, this color is proof that our current theory about the color spectrum is wrong and that we need to re-evaluate our notions about what a color is.
>>16150001Retards feel offended that it challenge their understanding of what a color is so they lash out at magenta
>>16150009magenta is made by god to test our faith. just like dinosaur bones
>>16150017Which is funny because magenta is opposite of green, the religious color (atleast for islam)
>>16150070>the religious color (atleast for islam)huh, they have colors?what colors is for the rest of them?
>>16149848then you took the brown acid anon. lay low awhile
Im in uni and the professor is asking what that is. He is screaming at the class bc we dont know.
it's a yellow triangle with a black outline. he must be having a stroke
My peanus weaanus :D
i was just perusing nairaland and i noticed they like the same kind of memes that /sci/ does
>>16149890if you don't have a hammer and a metal rod that can go through copper you're not worthy of being called a man
>>16149896What should I be called, then?
>>16149945a hammerless faggot?
>>16149953To be a faggot one must by definition be a man
>>16135690there's a rule about only wokeshit being allowed here?
What makes schizophrenic people draw shit like this? All I got from looking it up was it’s a chemical imbalance in the brain that messes up your dopamine receptors but how does that translate to the weirdly specific recurring symptoms like drawing shapes and thinking the government is hunting you down because you’re the new Jesus? Have they done much research into this?
>>16150087Oh, and when I ascended in 2017, I felt my body move through SpaceTime, not space, and fundementally perceived the passage of time as my atomic decay.Literally.
>>16150087>l I got from looking it up was it’s a chemical imbalance in the brain that messes up your dopamine receptors but how does that translate to the weirdly specific recurring symptoms It doesn't because schizophrenia isn't a chemical imbalance issue. That's a myth propagated by the pharmaceutical companies because they had to find an explanation as to why all these people got put on what originally amounted to sedatives and tranquilizers, e.g. first-generation antipsychotics. That stuff made you drool out of your mouth.>Have they done much research into this?No, they haven't. Why would they. You believe that it goes from A to B where it is the schizophrenia (A) that causes people to draw weird stuff (B). In fact, however, the diagnostic procedure goes from B to A. In other words, for you to have schizophrenia, you must have been drawing weird stuff in the first place.
>>16150087>chemical imbalance in the brain that messes up your dopamine receptorsthat's bullshit promoted to sell drugs not actually backed by any evidence
>>16150087>Have they done much research into this?Project Monarch, MKUktra, and various other project in the same vein but not under those titles.Yes.And is partially connected to Epstein Islands and elitist cults. Im aware of them. Also connected to deep state groups.Allllll connected.
Previous thread: >>16109209 >what is /sqt/ for?Questions regarding maths and science. Also homework.>where do I go for advice?>>>/sci/scg or >>>/adv/>where do I go for other questions and requests?>>>/wsr/ >>>/g/sqt >>>/diy/sqt etc.>how do I post math symbols (Latex)?rentry.org/sci-latex-v1>a plain google search didn't return anything, is there anything else I should try before asking the question here?scholar.google.com>where can I search for proofs?proofwiki.org>where can I look up if the question has already been asked here?warosu.org/scieientei.xyz/sci>how do I optimize an image losslessly?trimage.orgpnggauntlet.comComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>16150030Use the fact [eqn]\sum_{k=1}^{n} k^a = \frac{1}{a+1}n^{a+1} + \frac{1}{2}n^a + ...[/eqn]Then in the limit everything but the first term should vanish.
>>16150082It is a Riemann sum, how does that make it easier?
Why does the tangent graph behave the way it does passing through infinity to negative infinity?
>>16150090You can use the fundamental theorem of Calculus to evaluate[eqn] \frac{1}{n^{2025}} \sum_{k=1}^n k^{2024} = \int_0^1 x^{2024} dx = \left. \frac{x^{2025}}{2025} \right|_{x=0}^1 = \frac{1}{2025}[/eqn]
>>16150093tangent is sine over cosine, so it goes to +/- inf whenever cos = 00 isn't an inflection point of cos, so its sign will always change upon passing through 0. Since sin's sign doesn't change at that same point (because of the phase difference), the result is that tan will always flip sign as it passes "through infinity"
Can a cycle/bounce exist, and could it mean we live infinite amounts of times, every single one of us?
hope not. once was enough for me
What's the purpose of taking the supremum of the infimum here in equation A1.5? This is apparently supposed to extend arithmetic to infinite decimals.(D is the set of finite decimals)
>>16149621There exists [math]i \in \mathbb{N}[/math] so>[math]a_n - 10^{-m} \leq b_i \leq \sup \{b_i | i \in \mathbb{N} \}[/math]Yes.>As the function [math]f[/math] is [math]\mathbb{D}[/math]-continuous it is true that for any [math]m[/math] there exists [math]k[/math] such that if the inputs are k-close, the outputs are m-close.First, it's not correct to use k-close as a synonym for "corresponding numbers are less than [math]10^{-k}[/math] apart." They are non-equivalent statements, and "k-close" is the more complicated, uglier one which we should avoid using where possible. Second, even with that substitution (which I would not expect to affect the truth of the statement), the statement is not true. In particular, it is false for finite decimal multiplication. We need to use the whole definition and not skip parts of it, or we don't have a proof.>Isn't that last statement by definition?No, in [math]\sup_j \inf_{i \leq -j} f([{\bf x}]_i)[/math], the [math]j[/math] runs over all integers. So we have to show this doesn't change the result.
>>16149946I don't see what's missing?
>>16150069You're missing the "with all [math]|x_i|, |y_i| < N[/math]" part.
>>16150073So if we replace the k-close statements with the corresponding [math]< 10^{-k}[/math] statements and also require that [math]|x_i| < N[/math] then my proof works?
>>16149946>No, in [math]\sup_j \inf_{i \leq -j} f([{\bf x}]_i)[/math], the [math]j[/math] runs over all integers. So we have to show this doesn't change the result.So we have to show it's the same whether it is all integers or all natural numbers?
EU finds that food products from India are all filled with carcinogenic chemicals, even products labeled "organic"https://indianexpress.com/article/lifestyle/food-wine/ethylene-oxide-mdh-everest-indian-food-spices-cancer-risk-health-9289998/How dangerous are the chemicals listed in the article?
>>16149656you have to be 18 to post here
>>16149550
dunno if the vid will play or not it is hit and miss on telegram depending on how big the vid ishttps://t.me/redicetv/10777
>>16149714How are your picrels always so based? You're the least schizo namefag I've seen.
>>16149635Tell me more about these 45 trillion dollars britain stole from india. I'd like to see the calculation if it exists, and also i want to see a similar calculation about british investments in india and their cumulative returns. Then i want to compare both sums to see if Britain was a net loss or win for India, as far as finances go.
>NASA says atmospheric CO2 would have to go to over 3500ppm before it would make a noticeable difference in the climate Whats the absorption limit of CO2, how does that work? Does anyone here know?
>>16146558>NASA says atmospheric CO2 would have to go to over 3500ppm before it would make a noticeable difference in the climateNow they're saying 500ppm will change it that much. What changed in fundamental understandings of physics since 1972 to make NASA change their estimates so much?
>>161478432.5ºC @ 3500ppm
>>16149206So, adding more CO2 would change nothing?
>>16148318You shouldn't source your information from anonymous people on the internet.
legit question is NASA in cahoots with big oil? or on same political side or something?
Soience now says basic hygiene is bad for you. Does anyone here trust this latest new soience?
>>16147998Brown hands typed this
>>16149366Indian degrees don't count, pajeet. Go roll in cow dung you disgusting animal.
>>16149408>projecting
>>16149366Best post ITT
>>16149366crusty ass weirdo
Today: more fractions
>>16148183experiment with how fractions behave with functions like square roots in the denominator[eqn]\text{Find $x$: } \cfrac{2x}{\sqrt{3}} = \cfrac{2\sqrt{3}}{3}[/eqn]
>>16148183Dont stop at calculus https://sheafification.com/the-fast-track/
>>16148239>>college calculus ab>>college calculus bc>>calculus 1>>calculus 2I dont like khan academy for that. Zorich or Spivak's books are better for that imo
>>16148821what the fuck did he mean by this?
>>16149776>CalculusWalter Rudin's Principles of Real Analysis
I hate the constant lecturing about morality and ethics in stem. Why should I have to have my experiments approved by some council of roasties to say that the animals and subjects are treated in some random deemed "ethical" manner. the only thing that should matter is the data is replicable in the end.
>>16149972slippery slope
>>16149980Niggers kill people and wreck society but you don’t have a problem with them
>>16150063Do you have an... ethical objection?
Ethics is just the way we make dumbasses do actual science instead of just metaphorically blindly blundering about. In the same way people "love science" but don't know how to do anything, people bitch about ethics holding back "real science" but again don't know what they're doing.
>>16150058Nah Sheego is on topic, she is an unethical scientist
